January 3, 2026
In 2024, I laid out a vision for how I thought technology was going to transform the practice of medicine. Let's take a look back at it and see where I was right and where I was off the mark:
Robo-scibes
I envisioned robo-scribes as gradually permeating into the practice of medicine, but they have taken off much faster than I could have imagined! Here in Northern California, every major healthcare system is using an AI scribe, with Kaiser Permanente, Sutter, and John Muir using Abridge, UCSF using Ambience, and Stanford using DAX Copilot from Microsoft/Nuance.
Diagnostic Assistant and Medical Knowledge Reference
I imagined AI would assist specific, well-defined diagnostic tasks like finding lung nodules on chest x-ray or identifying hemorrhage on non-contrast head CT. It has done those things, but what I didn't forsee is its widespread, rapidly growing use in everyday clinical decision-making, for example through easily accessible web-based chat interfaces like that provided by OpenEvidence. All my co-residents and classmates from medical school at other residency programs use OpenEvidence, and our attendings increasingly use it as well. It is quickly supplanting UpToDate as the go-to for medical knowledge, something I could not have predicted two years ago. I used to be suspicious of LLM-generated answers, but I appreciate how OpenEvidence includes links to the peer-reviewed literature within its answers, so I verify their veracity. These links additionally make me aware of the latest research, and facilitate evidence-based practice.